Thursday, February 07, 2013

China's Top Guns

Wired.com has a sobering assessment of China's recent aerial war games.



Let's set aside the jokes about parallel parking and realize that China has developed a world class air force, the largest next only to America's and Russia's, that will soon be deploying not one but two indigenous stealth fighters.

In terms of authenticity, China’s pretend air battles are getting pretty close to the real thing. That improving realism, combined with Beijing’s new fighters and other hardware, has some observers in the U.S. feeling uneasy. For decades the Pentagon has counted on highly realistic aerial training to mitigate the increasing age and decreasing size of its warplane holdings. “That [training] used to be a significant advantage U.S. air forces held relative to the PLAAF,” Dave Deptula, a retired Air Force general who flew F-15 fighters, tells Danger Room.

The Pentagon still maintains other aerial edges, with more and better fighters — including stealth models — and support planes plus decades of combat experience in the Balkans, the Middle East and Central Asia. But with every scripted dogfight over Dingxin, the American war game advantage shrinks — and with it the overall U.S. margin of superiority.

...The introduction of the Russian-made Su-30 fighter in the 1990s finally gave the PLAAF a modern warplane it could match with more intensive training techniques. Beijing massively expanded the Dingxin airbase and its adjacent flight range. The Chinese began deploying small numbers of pilots and planes to Kazakhstan for exercises, laying the foundation for far bigger war games back home.

Beijing also formed several aggressor units flying specially painted fighters meant to replicate the planes of China’s rivals.
Incrementally, and without much notice outside of China, the PLAAF transformed routine flight training into the regular Red Sword/Blue Sword mock air battles, modeled on Red Flag. By 2005 Beijing’s war games were well underway. And a few years after that, the frontline improvements began to show. As late as 2008 Chinese fighters couldn’t make it even halfway across the Taiwan Strait before being chased off by Taiwanese fighters and ground-based defenses. Today the situation is reversed, and Taiwanese jets find themselves quickly intercepted. “It shows improved reaction time and professionalism in the PLAAF,” Feng wrote.

...China probably still has a way to go before it can match the U.S. plane-for-plane in the air. But the contest has officially begun, and with every simulated dogfight over the plains surrounding Dingxin, the Chinese inch closer to achieving the kind of realistic training that transformed the U.S. military into the world’s leading air power.

Already Beijing enjoys one key advantage: Its training exercises receive steady funding, whereas the U.S. Air Force’s own budget has been repeatedly threatened by political posturing in Washington. “Given the massive reductions in U.S. air combat training coming in the event of sequestration, the PLAAF won’t have far to go to match and then exceed us in terms of flying time and exercises,” Deptula warns.

4 comments:

  1. "Realist" international theory is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    Decide that the law of the jungle prevails and that the strong eat the rich. Act accordingly. (If you're one of the strong.) And then shriek in terror as other countries arm to protect themselves.

    If we'd learn to cooperate instead of trying to dominate, all this fear and all this money wasting, would disappear.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes we could actually solve all of the great challenges facing mankind if we learned to cooperate but we'd rather destroy ourselves first. That is the flaw in our nature.

    The Chinese are responding to a very real threat America poses just as we used to feel threatened by Soviet tank armies pouring through the Fulda Gap or bombers coming over the polar ice cap.

    Google "operation Chimichanga" to see for yourself. The full court press to acquire the F35 is all part of this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There's the obligatory safety blanket: "China probably still has a way to go before it can match the U.S. plane-for-plane in the air."

    No evidence other than spec. If the PLAAF can intercept US trained and supported Taiwanese fighters...

    I mean, a Chinese attack sub surfaced in the middle ofa US carrier group not too long ago.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree, Boris, that it's always risky to rely on whistling past the graveyard. China has repeatedly surprised the West. That sub infiltrating the battle group off Hainan was a perfect example. When it surfaced it was declaring, "Guess what? I just sunk your aircraft carrier."

    With the stealth data China hacked out of Lockheed, BAE and Pentagon computers and the materials and electronics secrets they took home from the RQ-170 stealth drone that came down in Iran, they wasted no time in getting not one but two stealth designs in the air.

    ReplyDelete