Straight from enduring TorStar Rosie DiManno's stomach-churning screen on the terrorists in our midst, I came upon Toronto Muslim, Murtaza Hussain's insightful comments in The Guardian.
It is a curious experience to feel that the benign normality of your
life is constantly held hostage to forces outside your ability to
control. That effort of cultivating a positive image – building
relationships, respecting the law, living honestly, giving charity,
contributing to civil society – could potentially be degraded or wiped
out by forces far beyond your scope of influence as an individual.
Today, many Americans live in fear of the random nihilistic violence of terrorists. A 2011 Gallup poll showed that roughly 36% of Americans worry
about a potential terrorist attack killing them or one of their family
members – down from post-9/11 highs but still very significant. While
academic studies on the subject have shown that the actual risk of such
an event occurring is extremely low, the heinous violence at the Boston Marathon this past week shows that even the rarest of "black swan events" do eventually come to pass.
However, to Muslim Americans and other ordinary Muslim citizens of
western countries, the fear of being victimized by a terrorist attack is
magnified many times. While, like their fellow citizens, the chance of
them being personally harmed in such an attack is remote, they are
haunted by the very real danger that in the aftermath they will be
subjected to greater public scrutiny, abuse, suspicion and hostility.
Besides the fear of governments targeting their communities and curtailing their individual freedom, there exists an even broader and more diffuse fear.
While hate crimes targeting Muslims tend to spike in the aftermath of terror attacks (as has sadly been evidenced in attacks against ordinary Muslim Americans in Boston and New York
after the marathon bombing), these tend to be exceptional cases. The
real damage done to the social fabric by such attacks is the erosion of
trust and respect between society at large and its Muslim minorities.
Regardless
of the actions of individual Muslims – the overwhelming majority of
whom experience events such as terrorist attacks with just as much
disbelief, trauma and helplessness as their co-citizens – they are
nevertheless viewed as being somehow associated with them, simply due to
their ethnic or religious background. In the aftermath of the Boston
bombings, the unanimous feeling among my many Muslim friends, family and
acquaintances was one of overwhelming fear and dread that the
perpetrator might also be someone who professes to share our religious
identity.
For many Muslim citizens of western countries – especially among the
young – where they live today is the only home they have ever known and
the only place they have ever thoroughly understood or felt affection
for. The anxiety that despite respecting society's rules, the welcome
mat may still one day be pulled out from under you is very real and
common. Given the statements of some politicians and popular media figures, these concerns do not seem such a stretch.
Contrary to some hyperbolic depictions of Muslim minorities as a
nefarious fifth column within society, the average Muslim has about as
much control of, or connection to, the vile actions of terrorists as the
average white American does to school shootings or movie theater
massacres. But based on the fact that there are violent individuals in
the world who identify as Muslim, some completely deny that moderate Muslims even exist.
At
present, the public discourse around terrorism and minority groups
renders law-abiding, honest citizens unable to feel completely secure in
society. However much we condemn such attacks, distance ourselves from
them, identify with the victims, and offer our support to society, we
are liable to be viewed with reflexive suspicion, as perennial
"outsiders" in the national fabric.
2 comments:
Two very interesting posts in the context of your post.
"This includes Chuck Woolery, self-identified conservative and a relic of ’80s game shows, who displayed brilliant, evidence-based, sociological insights with this helpful tweet: “Muslims can’t seem to live in peace with anyone. Even each other. FACT.” He continued his love connections with Muslims by adding, “All Muslims are not terrorists. Most, if not all terrorists are Muslims. Please dispute that.”
Sure, Chuck, I will. In the U.S., 56 percent of terrorist attacks and plots have been perpetrated by right-wing extremists, 30 percent by eco-terrorists and 12 percent by Islamic extremists."
http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/i_am_not_the_tsarnaevs/
And
Why is Boston 'terrorism' but not Aurora, Sandy Hook, Tucson and Columbine?
Can an act of violence be called 'terrorism' if the motive is unknown?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/22/boston-marathon-terrorism-aurora-sandy-hook
Excellent points, CuJo. Thanks.
Post a Comment