Sunday, November 19, 2017

Soldier Guns Are for Soldiers



US Army infantry veteran Charles Clymer shreds today's popular myth of the "good guy with a gun" theory propagated by NRA types. He recoils at the idea that a locked and loaded citizenry will prevent mass mayhem on America's streets, in its schools and churches.



Our nation’s love of firearms, combined with our history of arrogance and hyper-masculinity, has produced a culture in which millions of (particularly younger) white men now believe they could, at any time, be the only thing standing between good and evil. A quick search on YouTube will provide countless videos of these would-be superheroes strolling down city streets with powerful rifles on display, begging for law enforcement to challenge their constitutional rights.
...
The problem with this narrative (besides a lack of research or data suggesting more guns does indeed prevent violence broadly) is that killing another human being, even a “bad” one, is not easy. This is not “Call of Duty”: Despite the damage that modern weaponry can inflict, there is a reason that soldiers and law enforcement officers receive thousands of hours of training in firearms and tactics. This training is physical, mechanical and, most importantly, psychological, because in order to efficiently and effectively kill other human beings in high-stress situations, one must be conditioned to negotiate that stress.

...The psychological strength required to act quickly and effectively in a mass shooting comes from the kind of monotonous training that over several years builds up muscle memory. It is tedious and often boring, and that’s the point: it enables soldiers to respond in stressful situations as though it’s second nature.
...

Moving around while firing at targets is a whole other ballgame and requires constant drilling that establishes strong muscle memory. I can’t tell you how many hours I spent going through monotonous exercises of intentionally falling on the ground with my weapon, getting back up, using a correct stance while in forward movement, and generally training my body to react with precision.

Yet, even in these controlled environments, with officers and sergeants who have ostensibly seen everything and typically exercise competent command of training operations, stupid mistakes still happen and people die. Even after all of this training, soldiers are still human beings who make mistakes.

When I see a young man openly carrying a firearm in public, whether to prove a political point or because he honestly believes at he could be called upon to stop an active shooter, I can only think of how much could go wrong. I do not see a “good guy with a gun”: I see a naive human who is more likely to exacerbate a tragedy than stop it. Is this person a civilian who has forgot to clear their weapon? Are they disciplined enough to avoid accidents? And if a mass shooting does occur, how do I know they will have the skills to take out the bad guy rather than, say, an innocent bystander?

...If a young man is brazen enough to brandish a powerful weapon just to attract attention, why would I trust they have the maturity to use it responsibly?

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/11/17/a-man-accidentally-shot-himself-and-his-wife-at-a-church-shortly-after-a-discussion-on-shootings/?utm_term=.1a6bdceaa973

    TB

    ReplyDelete

  3. Having a firearm is akin to riding a motorcycle - both can be very dangerous particularly when in the wrong hands. In this item an 81-year old brings his pistol to a church dinner. Then he shows the measure of his irresponsibility by passing it around for others to hold. Sure it was unloaded but you never, ever treat any firearm as unloaded. You always treat it as fully loaded with a round in the chamber even when you're certain it is not. A lot of people are killed by people who say they didn't know it was loaded or were sure the safety was on. That's just bullshit.

    The only time my rifles are loaded are when I'm at the rifle range, in position and ready to fire, or when I wander up some remote forest service road where there are creatures that can kill a person. Yet I always treat them at all times as though they're loaded and just a trigger pull away from firing.

    This old bugger should be charged but, given his age, he probably won't be. At the very least his pistol should be confiscated but, again, it probably won't be.

    ReplyDelete