Tuesday, June 19, 2018

He said What???


I just spotted this on the innerwebs. It's supposedly a tweet by Republican stalwart, Bill Kristol.


11 comments:

  1. Kristol's prior statement that America should unilaterally invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and Syria ALSO sound better in the original German. It takes a fascist war criminal to know a fascist war criminal. Just like it took a Democratic president to put kids in cages before the Republican started doing it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wrong,

      http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2018/jun/19/matt-schlapp/no-donald-trumps-separation-immigrant-families-was/

      When an Evil is too far for Kristol, well, that's a special kinda evil.

      It's especially nice to see the Leftier Than Thou's curling up in the warm embrace of the Nazi Party Talking Points.

      Kristol might be not doing much beyond words, but it's more than 98% of elected Republicans are doing, and of course, Treason Tribble Трамп's minions are cheering it on.



      Delete
  2. KK is definitely right on the money.
    No decent human being wants to be associated with anything touched by Kristol.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is plain WRONG: "Kristol might be not doing much beyond words."
    Hitler was also not doing much beyond words. Others did.
    from Wiki:
    Kristol was key to the defeat of the Clinton health care plan of 1993
    He was a leading proponent of the Iraq War
    He was a vocal supporter of the 2006 Lebanon War
    He was an ardent promoter of Sarah Palin
    He advocated for military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities
    He spoke strongly against the WiliLeaks and suggested using "our various assets to harass, snatch or neutralize Julian Assange
    He argued that the United States' military interventions in Muslim countries (including the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan, and the Iraq War) should not be classified as "invasions", but rather as "liberations"
    He backed President Barack Obama's decision to intervene in the 2011 Libyan civil war

    YOU are known by the company you keep.

    ReplyDelete

  4. Jay what's with this "leftier than thou" fixation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So, there are these ideological people that given 5 choices to vote:

      #1 Full Frontal Nazi
      #2 Bad, Horribly Bad,
      #3 Defence of the Status Quo,
      #4 Minor Bureaucratic Improvement,
      #5 Symbolic Protest Vote,

      Will chose:

      #1, because it will bring about The Revolution Sooner,
      #5, because #3 and #4 are not Perfection, even though Perfection isn't on the menu,
      or not voting, because Perfection isn't on the menu.

      an example of "Leftier Than Thou" in the US for example, is BLM vs. Bernie Bro's,

      Or Bernie's "not my problem" initial tweet to the current US crisis of sending kids to concentration camps for the non-crime of seeking refugee status.

      In my Riding, the Con always wins since the '80's. I always vote Dipper, even if I think the Dippers have gone neo-lib and the Cantidate is imperfect. The Lib's always a far 3rd, the Green never makes the board, etc.

      If "everybody" who voted left of the Con, picked one Candidate, the Con's would never win this riding.

      Sadly, often the "most Progressive" thing one can do, other than activism and engagement, is voting for the least worst option.

      Spudnik, etc, with out looking for it, you can find it on your Facebook Rage Uncles page, or your "Leftier Than Thou" acquaintences Facebook pages.

      Some theorize that the political spectrum is not a square grid, but instead, a circle, and that one can go so far left, that one winds up Nazi.

      That is the background of many a neo-con.

      Delete

  5. And Anon 5:07 - You are what's known as a "fuckwit." I'm not "keeping company" with Kristol, far from it. That's something wobbly going on in your mind.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Only "fuckwit" would post anything originating from kristol.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When the top war mongering neocon is criticizing someone else's policy (Trump's included), my reasoning (not to mention gut instinct) tells me that someone might be on a right track.

    ReplyDelete