Tuesday, October 27, 2015

It'll Never Fly




A glance at the morning headlines found several items asking if Canada should have a "Stephen J. Harper International Airport."  Sure, why not.

A short runway, maybe 1,800 feet all in, made up of broken concrete and asphalt to resemble the decay in our other national infrastructure. For overshoot protection, an emergency bitumen tailing pond shall be constructed at either end. Completely deregulated. No approach aids, no ILS, nothing. You're on your own at Harper International. There will be a tower. It will be unstaffed in the style of west coast Coast Guard facilities.

No terminal, no skyways. Arriving passengers will use emergency evacuation chutes and proceed to stand beneath the hold to catch their luggage. Those wishing to avoid full cavity search security will have twelve minutes to exit the airport perimeter fence.

In keeping with the theme of Harper International, there will be no access roads to the airport. That would be too much of a concession to vision. Access to the nearest town will be by foot along a pipeline trail.

As you can tell, I haven't fully thought this through. Your turn. What do you think would be fitting for Harper International?


20 comments:

  1. Few things would make me happier than seeing Harper International. We don't name airports after living people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The no fly list should include everyone who walks thru the doors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent observation, Anon.

    Dana, there will be no doors.

    ReplyDelete
  4. could it be built cool hand luke ditch style
    by ex-harper convicts
    after the treason trials?

    ReplyDelete
  5. It would need a fitting airport code. How about "YUK"?

    ReplyDelete
  6. it will require alot of manpower, you know with tanks, military gunmen and snipers:P

    ReplyDelete
  7. Coming from the same mainstream media hacks, I'm not surprised, but hopefully this never 'flies'.
    Of course, an insane asylum or swamp named after Herr Harper might be a fitting tribute.

    ReplyDelete
  8. And of course we need not to offfend our Arab friends, as you get SHIA from Stephen Harper International Airport, so in the spirit of good will and accuracy we need to call it Stephen Harper International Terminal. That acronym fits far better IMHO.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Love it! and that good old dry Canadian sense of humour. Problem is all this would just fly over the head of Harper, the one with absolutely no sense of humour. Gawd, his personal life must be soooo boring.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Anonymous - swamps are wonderful places please do not associate one with Harper, besides he'd want to fill it in

    ReplyDelete
  11. Harper singing beatle songs, constantly played over the loudspeaker.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The day we put the Lester B back on the board at yyz aka "Pearson International" I'll think about naming another airport.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Latte swilling West Coaster9:03 PM, October 27, 2015

    Well I have a better idea for his name, we are working on sewage treatment plants on Vancouver Island and we could name one after Harper, he should feel right at home circling the drain watching his career get the proverbial flush.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Not only an airport, an airline. The Brand is built around the flight attentants. First one already hired.
    https://twitter.com/ficklesonance/status/658844391289835521

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anyong said: Where a person was born is where a person is from. It is really humorous to know Albertans consider people who have moved into the province as "transients" except for Mr. Harper of course. Wouldn't it be more accurate to name a street after him? Let's say "Harper's Way"?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anyong said: Since we know this, why would Canadians want an airport named after him.


    Banks got $114B from governments during recession

    Support for banks 'more substantial than Canadians were led to believe': CCPA report

    ReplyDelete
  18. Actually, I think the fact that you have not thought this through completely is very appropriate.

    ReplyDelete