Tuesday, April 02, 2013

Chris Hedges Takes Down Intellectual America - Iggy's On His List Too


To Chris Hedges, America's intelligentsia are a pack of sell-outs who showed their true colours when they lined up to support George w. Bush's war on Iraq.   And Hedges is naming names:

The war boosters, especially the “liberal hawks”—who included Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Al Franken and John Kerry, along with academics, writers and journalists such as  Bill KellerMichael IgnatieffNicholas KristofDavid RemnickFareed ZakariaMichael WalzerPaul Berman,Thomas FriedmanGeorge PackerAnne-Marie SlaughterKanan Makiya and the late  Christopher Hitchens—did what they always have done: engage in acts of self-preservation. To oppose the war would have been a career killer. And they knew it. 

These apologists, however, acted not only as cheerleaders for war; in most cases they ridiculed and attempted to discredit anyone who questioned the call to invade Iraq. ...Hitchens said that those who opposed the attack on Iraq “do not think that Saddam Hussein is a bad guy at all.” He called the typical anti-war protester a “blithering ex-flower child or ranting neo-Stalinist.” The halfhearted mea culpas by many of these courtiers a decade later always fail to mention the most pernicious and fundamental role they played in the buildup to the war—shutting down public debate. Those of us who spoke out against the war, faced with the onslaught of right-wing “patriots” and their liberal apologists, became pariahs. ...The critique that I and other opponents of war delivered, no matter how well grounded in fact and experience, turned us into objects of scorn by a liberal elite that cravenly wanted to demonstrate its own “patriotism” and “realism” about national security. The liberal class fueled a rabid, irrational hatred of all war critics. Many of us received death threats and lost our jobs, for me one at The New York Times. These liberal warmongers, 10 years later, remain both clueless about their moral bankruptcy and cloyingly sanctimonious. They have the blood of hundreds of thousands of innocents on their hands.

You may recall that the Liberal's own annointed one, Ignatieff, supposedly admitted he had been wrong about Iraq but then smeared those who opposed the war as having been disingenuous and actually opposed just to Bush/Cheney.  And nobody in the Liberal ranks took Ignatieff down for that either.  Speaks volumes.

The power elite, especially the liberal elite, has always been willing to sacrifice integrity and truth for power, personal advancement, foundation grants, awards, tenured professorships, columns, book contracts, television appearances, generous lecture fees and social status. They know what they need to say. They know which ideology they have to serve. They know what lies must be told—the biggest being that they take moral stances on issues that aren’t safe and anodyne. They have been at this game a long time. And they will, should their careers require it, happily sell us out again

...Those who doggedly challenge the orthodoxy of belief, who question the reigning political passions, who refuse to sacrifice their integrity to serve the cult of power, are pushed to the margins. They are denounced by the very people who, years later, will often claim these moral battles as their own. It is only the outcasts and the rebels who keep truth and intellectual inquiry alive. They alone name the crimes of the state. They alone give a voice to the victims of oppression. They alone ask the difficult questions. Most important, they expose the powerful, along with their liberal apologists, for what they are.

2 comments:

Dana said...

I was musing to myself along similar lines when I saw that everybody interviewed on the 10th anniversary were the ones who got it wrong, created the propaganda and generally fucked up the world. None of the major media I saw seemed all that interested in finding out about the views of the people who'd bee right about what an illegal fiasco and tragedy the invasion of Iraq would be.

And in very much the same way, the people who predicted the 2007/08 financial crisis are once again absent from the news media. Once again making me think the there's another serious crisis on the way.

Stupidity, corruptibility and criminality would appear to be the required characteristics for the punditocracy today.

The Mound of Sound said...

Of course there's another serious crisis on the way. We've moved into a state of permanent political, economic, social and environmental instability. We have abandoned most of the rules and constraints we once used to build our civilization. I don't know if you've read the piece here on the Precautionary Principle or the items I wrote a few years back on posterity. Use the search window at the upper right and you can find them easily enough.