Friday, February 21, 2020

The Last Frontier - Teck's Fuzzy Math



Vancouver mining company, Teck Resources, is increasing the pressure on the Trudeau government to approve its Frontier mine proposal for the Athabasca Tar Sands.

Teck claims it will face a $1.13 billion write down if the feds don't play ball on the Frontier mine.

This comes at the same time as Teck announced a $910 million write down on its 21 per cent stake in the Fort Hills bitumen mine. The company blames the Fort Hills mark down on "lower market expectations for future oil prices."

Okay, let's get this straight. Teck is declaring a $910 million write off on an existing Tar Sands mine because of lousy oil prices. But it's going to declare an even bigger loss if the feds don't approve the Frontier mine that even Teck execs admit might not get off the ground anyway. From BNN Bloomberg:
“I don’t think [Teck will] build it,” said Brian Madden, senior vice president and portfolio manager at Goodreid Investment Counsel, on BNN Bloomberg Friday. “It’s not economic and I don’t think shareholders or the market will sanction them to splash out $10 billion, or whatever it’s going to cost to build this mine in the current oil price environment.” 
The impairment tied to Fort Hills dragged Teck into the red for the quarter ending Dec. 31, with a loss of $891 million, compared to a profit of $433 million a year earlier. On an adjusted basis, Teck earned $0.22 per share, down from $0.86 in the fourth quarter of 2018. Analysts, on average, were expecting profit per share of $0.39. 
“Ongoing global economic uncertainty negatively impacted commodity prices in the fourth quarter and that has continued into 2020, exacerbated by the effect on markets from the coronavirus and the impact of severe weather conditions in British Columbia, followed by blockades on rail lines,” said Teck CEO Don Lindsay in a release.
Sorry but this doesn't add up. Teck which has a total market cap of $10 billion writes off nearly a billion of that value on a Tar Sands mine due to chronically low (inadequate) world oil prices but will take a further $1.13 billion hit if Trudeau doesn't approve a mine that's not economically viable for a company that's getting cold feet about the project anyway.

I think somebody's trying to blow smoke up Justin's backside. I'm just not buying it. What do you think?

photo: the Suncor/Total/Teck Fort Hills mine.

6 comments:

Toby said...

Agreed. Smoke. Teck execs watched when Trudeau bought the pipeline for double what it's worth. One wonders how much he'll pay for a tar mine. He's being played.

The Disaffected Lib said...


I wish I could say you were wrong, Toby. You might just be right on this. Even if Teck has no plans on putting shovels into the ground, the approval of Ottawa might be enough to let them avoid taking a write down based on a groundless illusion.

Anonymous said...

We're being scammed. Teck's CEO spent 20 years at CIBC, where he was President of CIBC World Markets and Head of Investment and Corporate Banking. He knows damn well that the capital markets are very bearish on tar sands investments and he hasn't a hope in hell of developing the mine. After that massive writedown, he may be trying to save his own hide by pinning blame on the government if they don't approve what is obviously not only a poor investment but one that if developed would scuttle any hope of Canada meeting its Paris accord targets.

Cap

Trailblazer said...

Says it all!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKgPY1adc0A

Trudeau is about as smart as this fella!!

TB

The Disaffected Lib said...

Cap, I was wondering if Teck is looking at federal approval as a "value added" commodity should it be able to find someone willing to put $20-billion into that project.

The Disaffected Lib said...

TB, I'm not sure he's that simple.