If they don't want to tackle the major challenges of the day, why do they seek to govern our country? I'm not speaking of Stephen Harper, he's a dead loss, a total waste of keystrokes. I'm talking about Trudeau the Lesser of the Conservative-Lite Liberals and Tommy Boy Mulcair of the Latter Day Liberal New Democrats.
Both of these hucksters want to take over from Harper and both think that proposing to do a few things slightly differently is enough. It's not, not nearly enough, yet that is all they're putting on offer.
As BCL reminds us, Trudeau (like Mulcair) is a bitumen booster. Trudeau openly backs Keystone XL and the Kinder Morgan expansion. He wants to send Enbridge back to the drawing board on the Northern Gateway which is a far cry from just saying no.
In other words, Trudeau backs plans for the massive expansion of Athabasca production and dilbit export. Now I presume Trudeau is aware of the Harper government's recent report to the U.N. admitting that Canada's greenhouse gas emissions will soar by 38% by 2030 largely due to Tar Sands expansion. Where the rest of the world is demanding GHG cuts and while the EU is committing to 40% cuts by 2030, Canada is set to go, full bore, in the opposite direction. And Trudeau, by endorsing these pipelines, will happily be complicit in that.
Either you believe the scientific consensus that, unless we find some means of keeping warming under 2C to avoid tipping points triggering runaway global warming or you don't believe it.
Either you believe that our hope of staying within that 2C limit will necessitate that we leave 80% of our known fossil fuel reserves in the ground, unburned, or you don't believe it.
Either you believe that our only hope of staying within the 2C limit means opting for the cleanest, lowest-carbon fossil fuels and ditching the highest carbon products - coal and high-carbon petroleum, or you don't believe it.
If you support Keystone XL and the expanded Kinder Morgan and possibly a redesigned Northern Gateway, it admits of only two possibilities. Either you don't believe any of those three statements given above or, far worse, you do realize they're true but you're willing to give on those points for pure political expedience.
As David Suzuki recently pointed out, people like Trudeau and Mulcair are harming us by debating what's the best way to do something when it's something that shouldn't be done period.