Friday, November 22, 2013

A Victim of State Spycraft Speaks Out.

It's a safe bet that some of us are being spied upon by our government.  The prime minister's Northern Gateway secret police service is drawing up lists of opponents of the Enbridge pipeline iniative.  Yet, until you actually know you're being spied upon, investigated, targeted, it's all sort of hypothetical.  You don't dwell on it.

That's not the case for Emma Gilchrist.  She knows that the organization she until recently worked for, the Dogwood Initiative, has been branded an eco-threat by our government, is being actively spied upon and, worse, the intelligence gathered is being distributed to Canadian energy producers.  She has written a remarkable essay that was published in Thursday's Victoria Times Colonist.

Tuesday started out sunny for me, but hail fell out of the sky in the afternoon. It was a Victoria day like any other until I found out the Canadian government has been vigorously spying on Canadian organizations that work for environmental protections and democratic rights.
I read the news in the online Vancouver Observer. There, front and centre, was the name of the organization I worked for until recently: Victoria-based Dogwood Initiative.
My colleagues and I had been wary of being spied on for the past couple years, but having it confirmed still took the wind out of me. of the events detailed in emails from Richard Garber, the National Energy Board’s “group leader of security,” was at a workshop at a Kelowna church run by one of my colleagues. About 30 people, mostly retirees, attended to learn about storytelling, theories of change and creative sign-making. (Sounds threatening, right?)
In the emails, obtained under the Access to Information Act, Garber marshals security and intelligence operations between government operations and private interests and notes that his security team has consulted with Canada’s spy agency, CSIS.

 To add insult to injury, another set of documents shows CSIS and the RCMP have been inviting oil executives to secret classified briefings at CSIS headquarters in Ottawa, in what the U.K.’s Guardian describes as “unprecedented surveillance and intelligence sharing with companies.”

These meetings covered “threats” to energy infrastructure and “challenges to energy projects from environmental groups.” Guess who is prominently displayed as a sponsor on the agenda for May’s meeting? Enbridge.

It’s unclear how much information is being provided to corporations such as Enbridge and state-owned Sinopec, the [Chinese] oil company that has a $10-million stake in Enbridge’s Northern Gateway pipeline and tanker proposal.

What kind of country spies on environmental organizations in the name of the oil industry? It seems more Nigerian than Canadian. I felt one part indignant, one part sad for my country.

 I’m not what you might think of as a typical “environmentalist”— I grew up in northern Alberta playing hockey and going to bush parties. Before my stint in the non-profit world, I worked at the Calgary Sun and Calgary Herald.
I believe oil and gas deposits, including the oilsands, are a great asset — if developed in the public interest. A big “if,” but Canadians own these resources and the No. 1 priority when developing them should be that Canadians benefit.

For speaking out against increasing oil exports off B.C.’s coast, hundreds of people like me have been called radicals and painted as enemies of the state, as somehow un-Canadian. That last bit bothers me the most.
I love my country. And in my eyes, there isn’t anything much more patriotic than fighting for the interests of Canadian citizens.

I’ve argued that after 25 years of oilsands development, Albertans should have something to show for it — not be facing budget crises and closing hospital beds. Canadians should develop resources at a responsible pace that doesn’t cause rampant inflation and unduly harm the environment, and should prioritize national energy security, instead of allowing half our country to depend on foreign oil.

 I don’t expect everyone to agree with me, but it’s a stretch to portray any of those statements as unpatriotic or radical.
It saddens me that Canada has been reduced to spying on its own citizens when they speak out against certain corporate interests, and then shares that intelligence with those corporations.

Wherever you stand on natural-resource development, I’d hope we could all agree Canada should be a country where we can debate the most important issues of our time — without fear of being attacked or spied on by our own government.

The New Democrats and the Liberals need to stand up for Emma Gilchrist all the thousands like her.  They need to promise that, if elected, they will end government spying on Canadians absent clear evidence of criminal activity or intent.   Our government has no business spying on law abiding citizens because they might dissent and it has no business parcelling out the information they gather to the corporate sector.  This is an act of raw fascism and nothing else.  That's a disease that will only worsen unless we commit to stomping it out.


Anonymous said...

This is one more reason why I dispare regarding the state of affairs in Canada over the environment. We the people who are supposed to vote for ethical people to represent us for the good of Canadians, is not what is taking place. The mantra of everyone in this country ought to be: Educated Canadians, Educated Canada; Healthy Canadians, healthy Canada: Employed Canadians, Employed Canada. (Anyong)

The Mound of Sound said...

You're right.