Tuesday, February 19, 2013

How Harper Was Conned

Who says you can't bullshit a bullshitter?   Don't tell that to the procurement wizards at our Department of National Defence.  They've been pulling the wool over the eyes of our gullible prime minister almost since he took office.   Michael Byers and Stewart Webb chronicle how hapless Harper got fleeced:

In the style of the classic BBC show, politicians have long been “Yes Ministered” by the Department of National Defence. The problem has reached new heights under Harper, who came to power believing the generals and admirals could do no wrong.

 Defence officials decided the CF-18 replacements needed stealth technology, thus excluding all aircraft other than the F-35. They narrowed the field for the fixed-wing search and rescue project by specifying a minimum cabin length just 15 centimetres greater — and a cruising speed just 12 knots faster — than the Spanish-made EADS C-295. They set a minimum size for Canada’s maritime helicopter replacement that excluded the Sikorsky Seahawk, the workhorse of the U.S. navy’s rotary wing fleet.

Officials like to buy so-called “paper planes” that are only in the design phase, since this offers the possibility of having the very latest and flashiest kit. But there are risks involved with unbuilt, unproven designs. The F-35 design proved grossly optimistic, leading to long delays, much-increased costs, and less than expected performance. The U.S. Department of Defense has already downgraded its specifications for the plane.

In the case of the planned Sikorsky Cyclone helicopters chosen to replace the Sea Kings, the generals and admirals added new electronics and weapons systems onto the design after the procurement was approved and a contract signed. All the additional equipment proved too heavy for the engines, which meant that more powerful engines had to be designed and fitted, which in turn required a lengthy and expensive full re-engineering of the aircraft.

Defence officials secure approval for these “paper planes” by telling ministers that Canadian companies involved in the initial production of cutting-edge military equipment will reap significant rewards when other countries purchase the same equipment later. The problem is that new designs fail more often than they succeed, and other countries shy away from equipment that underperforms or is overly delayed. No country apart from Canada has selected the Cyclone. Sales of the F-35 are far below the projected level, diminishing any economic benefits and driving up the per-unit cost.

Officials also lowball costs, or fail to inform ministers about maintenance, infrastructure and other “life-cycle” expenses related to the purchase. For the F-35s, defence officials said the cost would be $9.7 billion. The parliamentary budget officer said $29.3 billion. The auditor general said $25.1 billion. When the government brought in the accounting firm KPMG to provide some clarity, it said $45.8 billion.

As for the Cyclones, their projected cost has doubled to $5.7 billion — for just 28 helicopters. This price does not include infrastructure costs, such as the refitting of Canada’s existing naval vessels to accommodate the new aircraft.

For seven years, Harper and his ministers have failed to oversee these and other procurements. Defence officials, left on their own and bursting with self-confidence, went on incautious spending sprees.

Worst of all, nobody showed any concern for the front-line Canadian Forces personnel left flying out-of-date and unsafe aircraft, like the 50-year-old Sea Kings, the 40-year-old Buffalo search and rescue planes, and the 30-year-old CF-18s.

Sideshow Harper and his minion, Airshow MacKay, were gullible to the point of recklessness in just about every aspect of Canada's armed forces.   They really believed that they are their generals were sympatico and that the boys in uniform were somehow a sub-unit of the Conservative government.  This, of course, is in keeping with Harper's methodical transformation of the public and armed services into his partisan political agencies.   It's not surprising he got conned.   He had it coming.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

So Steve and Pete are not the sharpest tools in the shed? Not a surprise to anyone who has been watching.