Dion's "Rigorous Process" Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

Merchants of Death.

The Saudi war wagon deal is hanging around the Trudeau government's neck like a long dead fish. It's another rotten deal foisted off on Canadians by Cap'n Sunny Ways (or as Alison at Creekside might call him, Cap'n "Sunni Ways").

It doesn't matter to Justin & Co. that they've had to lie at every turn about the contract for billions of dollars worth of light armoured fighting vehicles.

It reminds me a lot about Harper. Remember when Harper tried to defend the purchase of F-35 stealth light bombers by claiming that the Liberals under Martin had run the selection process, made the choice and inked the contract? That was just a bundle of lies that eventually collapsed under their own weight.

The Trudeau government apparently learned nothing from Harper's disgrace. They came into office ready and willing to lie their asses off to defend the Saudi war wagon deal. If you can bear it, here's our foreign affairs minister, Steffie Dion, from January 6 awkwardly defending the sale as a "done deal" from the Harper days.



The CBC's Neil Macdonald does a masterful job at eviscerating Steffie Dion and his fabulous fabrications.

Well. If further proof was needed that the sunny new regime in Ottawa is perfectly capable of behaving just like the un-sunny previous regime, we now have it, in a memo that was stamped "Secret," then rather inconveniently laid bare in the Federal Court of Canada.

The document, signed by Foreign Affairs Minister Stéphane Dion, is a gem of hair-splitting, parsing, wilful blindness and justification for selling billions worth of fighting vehicles and weaponry to Saudi Arabia, one of the most oppressive regimes on Earth.

...It employs the death-merchant logic of a long list of other countries that have profited for decades by arming despots: The deal means jobs and the customer assures us it won't misuse the weapons and we can't prove otherwise.

...Among other things, Dion explicitly endorses Saudi Arabia's ruinous military campaign in Yemen, the victims of which, according to the United Nations, are overwhelmingly civilian.

The Saudi-led campaign, Dion agrees, is an attempt to "counter instability" in Yemen and is "consistent with Canada's defence interests in the Middle East."

"Canada's defence interests," just what does that mean? Yes, the "instability" to which Dion alludes would be Yemen's Houthi rebels who are engaged in fierce battles with the very Sunni ISIS and al Qaeda forces. Yes, that instability. And our allies, the Saudis, are bombing the hell out of anti-ISIS Houthi fighters and their wives and kids back at home. Boil it down, they're flying air support for ISIS. And, quothe Dion, that's "consistent with Canada's defence interests." And they're primarily attacking helpless Houthi civilians, sort of Guernica style, which rings all the "war crimes" bells but, again, "consistent with Canada's defence interests."

Deliberately targeting civilians. Hmm - oh yeah, that's what Osama bin Laden did, isn't it? Sure it is. Wait a sec. Yeah, sure - that's Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions. You can't do that. It's a war crime. Even the UN Sec Gen has said as much. Only it's "consistent with Canada's defence interests" as this government sees it.

I don't know. Is this what you Liberals signed on for when you voted these guys into office last October?

Neil Macdonald reports that just 20% of Canadians still support the Saudi arms deal. They're not even getting half of Conservative voters with those numbers. Macdonald's right. Harper/Trudeau - same old, same old.

Update:  In case you're not familiar with what this contract is all about you might want to watch this video. It shows the US military's Stryker combat vehicle which uses the General Dynamics Land Vehicle, the Canadian-made LAV we're supplying to the Saudis, and marries it to a big gun turret the LAV is designed to take.



It's believed that a number of the Saudi deal vehicles will be shipped to Europe to have the heavy gun turret fitted. My, my - I wonder what those silly Sauds have in mind for them?