Canadians have not yet shown themselves ready for the jackboot conservatism the British endure under their Cameron government but that doesn't mean we're immune to it either. The Observer's Barbara Ellen wrote a cautionary piece that I think all Canadian progressives would do well to digest.
The Methodists, the United Reformed Church, the Church of Scotland and the Baptist Union have joined forces to publish a study called The Lies We Tell Ourselves. It highlights myths surrounding people and poverty, including Iain Duncan Smith's much trumpeted "families out of work for three generations" line (which, it turns out, has never been backed up by data).
The report argues that the government is "deliberately misrepresenting" the poor, blaming them for their circumstances while ignoring more complex reasons, including policy deficiencies. Moreover, they feel that this scapegoating is the result of collusion between politicians, the media and the public.
...increasingly, the shame is being taken out of poor-shaming. It didn't seem so long ago that most people would think twice about denigrating fellow citizens who were having a hard time. These days, it appears to have been sanctioned as a new national bloodsport, regularly slipping under the PC-radar as little else manages to.
...A politician is one thing but these attitudes are spreading and hardening among ordinary people too. Indeed, poverty seems a trigger to inspire hate speech that would be quickly denounced if it related to race or gender.
Is this our new default setting – that the needy are greedy? This chimes with a slew of government policies that appear to be founded on notions of bulletproof self-reliance, making no allowances for circumstances or sheer bad luck, and which many would require huge amounts of help to put into practice, never mind sustain. Meanwhile, the more fortunate are invited to pour scorn upon anyone who fails.
How does this kind of thing escalate? That's easy. At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious, the poor are poor. They have no money, no voice, no representatives, and no means to establish their own public profile. Poverty is a big domino – once it falls, everything goes. In such circumstances, if a group of people are "deliberately misrepresented" then there's precious little they can do about it. The churches got it right – if anything, the truth seems so much worse that it must surely be time to put the shame back into poor-shaming. Just like slut-shamers, poor-shamers are bullies, and right now they're getting away with it.
2 comments:
In the 1930's Germany, this line of blaming the poor for escalating poverty, led to the rise and victory of fascism over the socialists. And guess which segement of society delivered it into the Nazi's hands; the professional classes, bureaucrats, and small business entrepreneurs, or in other words, a fearful navel-gazing middle class.
If you don't believe it, ask yourself how Hilter was able to organize so quickly and thoroughly, such a potent machine of war and control, and why so many Germans of that time can't speak of it. Its because they helped him!.
Excellent observations, Anon. Thank you very much for that.
Post a Comment